oseshirts.blogg.se

I blame myself for not doing anything else but how it works. I try to vary my strategies, but I always end up very often the same way. Neither is right or wrong, it depends on what YOU are comfortable/best with. Some fighters make a game plan to adjust their style to avoid an opponent strengths and exploit their weaknesses (Ali). Some fighters concentrate on their skills and make a plan based on their abilities regardless of the opponent (Mayweather). I like to develop a team along definite play styles to see how that style works then just make small adjustments for injuries or opponent strengths. "For me, the biggest edge that the player have over the AI is the ability to position his guys second." - This part will always be true until your team has developed far enough to have a defined style - even then if you play a reactive style adjusting formations is very important. Of course all this depends on how your team develops (transfers and youth development). A forward line with a natural CF (I like a Rainbow on my CFs) and 2 UF at least 1 with Header, the other with Canon so I can play them at wide angles to stretch the defence. A mid-line with either a L/R.Mid and UMid who can be moved L forward or to the D Mid spot depending on opponent. Usually a back line with 3 CD and both a LD, RD. Sometimes a sweeper or not depending on how many F the opponent has. (Once I get past the Amateur leagues.) I most often play a 5-2-3. I actually think a L/R Mid F work best for this because of their strong lateral movement. A 5-4-1, If I have MF (normally LMF, RMF, AMF) who are good shooters or have CANON it can work with a decent CF.